EPRI/SQURTS Survey

EPRI/SQURTS Process Test Rep Feedback Survey

Choose week number:

Note: please select projects which you were witness of...

SQURTS Project: S8019SE Levels: Site Specific Test Rep: Tentative Test Date:

Utility	Manufacturer	Description	Model	Sup.	Due	Rec'd	Submit'l	TT Proj
Luminant	General Electric	Motor Starter	CR309D00200FDAAA	Utility	1-Sep		28-Aug	T8410EL

SQURTS Project: S8021SE Levels: Table Limits - 14g Test Rep: Tentative Test Date:

Utility	Manufacturer	Description	Model	Sup.	Due	Rec'd	Submit'l	TT Proj
FirstEnergy Corp (FE-BV)	Meriam Instruments Inc.	D/P Gauge, Explosion Proof, 0-44.2 IN WC with 0-50 IN Linear Scale	1226X-2-50-316EH-316CP-316BE-LINEAR-3000	Trentec	13-Oct		6-Oct	T8193EL

SQURTS Project: S9001SE Levels: Table Limits - 14g Test Rep: Tentative Test Date:

Utility	Manufacturer	Description	Model	Sup.	Due	Rec'd	Submit'l	TT Proj
Exelon / Quad Cities	Atkomatic	Solenoid Valve	31430004PCDD2C	Trentec	24-Nov		23-Oct	T8533EL
Exelon / Quad Cities	Spencer Turbine Company	BLOWER, CENTRIFUGAL, COMPLETE ASSEMBLY	G100-3/4-MOD 2110S	Trentec	30-Nov		7-Nov	T8365EL

SQURTS Project: S9002SE Levels: Floor Test Rep: Tentative Test Date:

Utility	Manufacturer	Description	Model	Sup.	Due	Rec'd	Submit'l	TT Proj
Arizona Public Service Company	Schaevitz Sensors	Position Transmitter	IEM-422	Utility	2-Feb		6-Dec

Witness Information:

Witness Name:
Email:
Utility:

Test Item Submittals:

Were submittals received in a timely manner?:
Were submittals completed with required information?:
Did submittals adequately identified any needs?:
Was the information supplied on the submittals accurate?:
Comments:

Test Schedule:

Was the schedule developed and available in time to accommodate you?:
Was the schedule followed?:
Was your input solicited in schedule formation?:
Were your scheduling needs met?:
Comments:

Test Plans:

Were the plans submitted to you timely enough for review?:
Did the plans adequately meet your needs?:
Were sponsoring utility plan reviews and approvals timely?:
Were required plan revisions made in a timely fashion?:
Comments:

Test Setup:

Were Trentec supplied test samples avail. to support test schedule?:
Were utility supplied test samples avail. to support test schedule?:
Were utility supplied test samples packaged appropriately for shipment to Trentec?:
Were Trentec supplied fixtures available to support the test schedule?:
Were utility supplied fixtures available to support the test schedule?:
Were Trentec supplied hardware available to support the test schedule?:
Were utility supplied hardware available to support the test schedule?:
Were the tests set up and ready to go in accordance with the test schedule?:
Comments:

Test Performance:

Were all baseline functional tests performed in advance?:
Were all baseline functional anomalies identified and addressed?:
Were sismic operability tests performed in accordance with the test plans?:
Were items monitored appropriately during seismic events?:
Was the sponsoring utility contacted for any problems?:
If so, were the contacts specified on the submittal available and helpful?:
Were site-specific tests levels provided in case items did not meet generic levels?:
Did the seismic table perform without difficulty?:
Comments:

Test Sample Performance:

Did any test items perform abnormally?:
Were there any modifications required to make a test sample pass?:
Was the item description provided by the utility/manufacturer accurate and adequate?:
Were any lessons learned to help procure an item better?:
Comments:

Personnel:

Were Trentec personnel available and prepared to conduct and monitor tests?:
Were Trentec personnel technically capable of addressing problems?:
Were Trentec personnel courteous and helpful?:
Comments:

Overall:

Identify any strong points in this test sequence:
Identify any weak points in this test sequence:
General Comments: